Koryu · 黄龍
Koryu
← Research library
Research · 研究 · Evaluation

Evaluation.
Kicking the tires.

The consumer-protection shelf: how to verify signal providers, what win rates hide, what services actually cost, and named reviews held to a published standard. Every check here is one you can run yourself.

7 published measurements · top-100 liquid universe · regime dial with fixed thresholds · refreshed every 4 hoursEvery formula published · the board · attested daily · research, not advice

10 notes · Evaluation

Research · 研究 · 145 · Evaluation

AltSignals review: legit is a floor, not a verdict.

Running since 2017, monthly results published, products near $100 a month: real credit, and the gap between legit and verifiable, examined. Re-checked Oct 2026.

22 Oct 20266 min readEvaluation
Research · 研究 · 143 · Evaluation

Are AI crypto trading bots legit? Pass the questions, any model. Fail them, no label helps.

What learning systems really do in markets, why crypto is hostile to them, the AI-washing taxonomy, and four separating questions that never mention AI.

20 Oct 20265 min readEvaluation
Research · 研究 · 07 · Evaluation

The feed can be edited. That is the whole review.

The direct answer, the tracked-vs-claimed accuracy gap, the referral economics that make dishonesty structural, and what a legitimate provider must show.

Updated 1 Aug 20266 min readEvaluation
Research · 研究 · 08 · Evaluation

Ninety-five percent accurate, and broke by winter.

The catalogue of accuracy-manufacturing tricks, why win rate is the wrong metric even when honest, and the two-question test that collapses the act.

13 Jul 20266 min readEvaluation
Research · 研究 · 09 · Checklist

Seven questions, fifteen minutes, no statistics degree.

A fifteen-minute audit anyone can run: editable history, hidden losses, undefined wins, no bear market, no method, referral economics, the screenshot test.

Updated 1 Aug 20267 min readEvaluation
Research · 研究 · 13 · Evaluation

A real catalogue, an unfalsifiable oracle.

The largest AI crypto ratings platform, reviewed on verifiability: the product, which claims can be checked, the seven-checks scorecard, and who it suits.

Updated 1 Aug 20266 min readEvaluation
Research · 研究 · 14 · Evaluation

Ranked by proof, not by promises.

Every kind of crypto signal service, ranked by whether its claims can be verified: copy trading, analytics, AI ratings, Telegram groups, measurement boards.

Updated 19 Oct 20266 min readEvaluation
Research · 研究 · 15 · Evaluation

The records are real. The leaderboard still lies.

Venue-verified records make copy trading the most honest signal category, yet leaderboards still mislead: survivorship, capital-arrival curse, execution drag.

13 Jul 20266 min readEvaluation
Research · 研究 · 17 · Evaluation

The anomaly is real. The industry mostly isn't.

The anomalies are real; the industry mostly is not. Four structural leaks between a genuine edge and a subscriber's account, and when a signal can work.

13 Jul 20265 min readEvaluation
Research · 研究 · 18 · Evaluation

Ninety percent of the dashboard, for exactly zero dollars.

The free screening stack that covers most of what paid dashboards sell: aggregators, charting screeners, exchange tools, on-chain tiers, measurement boards.

13 Jul 20265 min readEvaluation